The International Cricket Council (ICC) has dismissed allegations of preferential treatment after the England cricket team were able to leave India earlier than other teams following their exit from the ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026.
Concerns were raised after England reportedly departed from Mumbai on a charter flight soon after their semi-final loss, while teams such as the West Indies cricket team and the South Africa national cricket team remained in India for several days awaiting travel arrangements. Both teams had already been eliminated from the tournament but were unable to depart immediately due to logistical complications.
ICC denies claims of preferential treatment
The situation drew criticism from former England captain Michael Vaughan, who suggested that influential cricket boards receive favourable treatment from the global governing body. Taking to social media, Vaughan questioned why England were able to leave promptly while other teams were left waiting.
South African players Quinton de Kock and David Miller also voiced their frustration online, claiming that their teams had received little communication regarding their departure plans. De Kock remarked that it was “strange how different teams have more pull than others,” while Miller highlighted that England were able to return home despite being eliminated later than some teams.
West Indies head coach Daren Sammy also joined the criticism, backing Miller’s remarks and questioning the lack of clarity around travel arrangements.
Also Read: BCCI announces record cash bonus for Indian team following T20 World Cup 2026 triumph
Responding to the controversy, the ICC rejected the claims of bias and stated that travel decisions were dictated by operational constraints rather than influence. According to the governing body, factors such as airspace availability, aircraft routing permissions, visa requirements and safety considerations determined the departure schedule.
The ICC further emphasised that the ongoing disruptions to international air travel across parts of the Middle East had created complex logistical challenges, and the safety of players, officials and staff remained its top priority while coordinating departures for the affected teams.
