The fate of the T20 World Cup 2026 remains uncertain after the Pakistani government instructed its team not to take the field against India in their scheduled February 15 clash. While back-channel communication began soon after the announcement, the International Cricket Council (ICC) and the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) have now entered formal talks to defuse the crisis.

Also Read: ‘We could have been smarter’: Suryakumar Yadav’s honest verdict after gritty win over USA

However, former ICC chairman Ehsan Mani has urged fans not to be overly optimistic, warning that the situation may have already escalated beyond easy repair. Without singling out any one party, Mani pointed to political interference as the root cause of the standoff, describing Pakistan’s decision as one driven by “frustration”.

Mani drew from his experience at the helm of the ICC, stressing that timely dialogue is essential to prevent disputes from spiralling.

“I feel that as ICC chairman, I would have tried to find a solution. You don’t want to throw any member out of a tournament,” Mani said. “The PCB has taken a stand, but I would have preferred they spoke first instead of taking such a step. People should be talking, not threatening or taking drastic action and that responsibility lies on both sides.”

Mani revealed that the ICC board’s decision was unanimous, with Pakistan being the lone dissenting voice.

“Usually, a board decision should be accepted,” he said. “But the PCB feels it was unfair or politically motivated. This should have been addressed early. Mr Jay Shah and Mr Naqvi should have spoken directly. Pakistan’s reaction stems largely from feeling ignored.”

While a slim window for resolution still exists, Mani believes only leadership-level talks can break the deadlock.

“To be honest, I wouldn’t hold too much hope unless discussions happen at the very top, chairman to chairman,” he said. “I would have liked to see Mr Jay Shah make a gesture, even travelling to Pakistan if needed. During my tenure, I personally met Indian ministers to resolve sensitive matters.”

Mani concluded by emphasising that goodwill and direct engagement are the only way forward. “Sending emissaries only passes messages back and forth. The chairmen must meet face to face.”