NEW DELHI: These are uncertain times for Yashasvi Jaiswal. Once seen as the most natural all-format successor in the post-Rohit Sharma-Virat Kohli era, the young opener now finds himself navigating a period of flux within Indian cricket.

Labelled, perhaps prematurely, as a "one-format specialist," Jaiswal appears caught in the crosscurrents of selection calls that have only added to the uncertainty around his role.

Yashasvi Jaiswal gives health update after hospitalisation, thanks fans for support

What makes the situation more perplexing is that Jaiswal remains the only young Indian batter in recent years to have convincingly displayed the technique, temperament and adaptability required to succeed across formats.

Yet, almost inexplicably, whenever India has embarked on a major white-ball assignment over the past two years, fortune has repeatedly failed to smile on the Bhadohi-born cricketer, leaving opportunity just out of reach.

Experience over promise in T20s

In 2024, Jaiswal was forced to come to terms with the reality that experience trumped promise, as Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma were preferred for the T20 format on the demanding surfaces in the USA and the Caribbean.

Yashasvi Jaiswal sends loud message to selectors with SMAT century

Barely seven months later, the pattern repeated itself in 50-over cricket. Jaiswal initially found a place in India's provisional Champions Trophy squad of 15, only to be pushed out when head coach Gautam Gambhir insisted on the need for a fourth spinner, once again leaving the young opener expendable.

Selection logic shifts again

The uncertainty deepened in T20s when Shubman Gill - widely seen as India's next all-format leader - was sidelined, prompting the selectors to rethink their balance. The solution they arrived at was unconventional: converting the second wicketkeeper into an opener. That decision opened the door for Ishan Kishan, fresh off a blistering 49-ball century for Jharkhand against Haryana in the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy final.

No one bothered that Jaiswal also scored a 50-ball ton against the same opponents in a chase of 230-odd only days before.

Making way again

And within another two and half weeks, we will again find Jaiswal out of an Indian ODI playing eleven come January 11 despite scoring a hundred in national team's previous game against South Africa.

This time, he will have to make way for regular ODI skipper Shubman Gill.

He will turn 24 on Sunday and has enough years to make up for the chances he is forced to miss but he needs to be told where he is going wrong. These are times when self belief does take a hit.

Vengsarkar questions the logic

"It is unfortunate that Yashasvi is being left out time and again for no fault of his. He has been in tremendous form across all formats of the game and I don't know what else he has to do to get into the team," Dilip Vengsarkar, perhaps the finest chairman of selectors in the last three decades, told PTI when asked how he looks at it.

He last played T20Is in Sri Lanka in July, 2024 after which India prioritised Test cricket for next six months and Jaiswal was also asked to concentrate in red ball cricket.

Numbers that back the argument

His last five T20I scores read 93, 12, 40, 30 and 10 -- all while opening the innings -- and at a strike-rate of close to 200, conforming to current team's philosophy of attack at all costs without worrying about volume of runs.

"Nobody should leave a match winner out of the team," Vengsarkar said in a forthright assessment.

Vengsarkar, who basically pushed a 19-year-old Virat Kohli into the Indian side back in 2008, however, agreed with current selection committee on Shubman Gill's exclusion as he feels current form does play a huge role in picking a particular cricketer. But, he is also clear in his mind who would have been his first choice while excluding Gill.

"They are all excellent players but I am with selection committee when they judge players on basis of current form and fitness. Current form does play an important role in context of selection. And if you ask whom I would have picked instead of Gill, my choice would have been Jaiswal. He has proven time and again what a class performer he is and has always given the team kind of starts required these days," said the former India skipper and a veteran of 116 Tests and 129 ODIs.

The T20 format doesn't reward absence. Rhythm is the main currency, and visibility does matter.

While others stayed in the white-ball loop, rotating through bilateral series, staying familiar to selectors, Jaiswal slipped out of sight. Not because he failed, but because the system redirected him.

"You are bound to lose confidence if you are made to feel that you are not required in one format. I mean it will affect his confidence and this game is all about confidence. And confidence comes when you have performances backed by runs," Vengsarkar didn't hold back.

If performance, impact, and adaptability are the stated metrics, then Jaiswal stands among the strongest candidates in the country.

Former India opener and one of the most respected coaches, WV Raman, feels that chairman of selectors Ajit Agarkar must have had a chat with Jaiswal.

"Certain conversations can't be revealed in public but now World T20 squad has been selected and one can't do anything. Jaiswal will have to bide his time but I am confident that the kind of talent he is, he will play many more World Cups," Raman said.

Vengsarkar had the last word when asked what he would have told Jaiswal had he now been the chairman of selectors.

"I wouldn't have told him anything because I wouldn't have dropped him in the first place," Vengsarkar replied.

(With PTI Inputs)